测试日常杂谈(3)(Daily test talk (3))

    本周在工作上又有一些新的想法和思考。最近负责的一个项目上线了,在项目上线前三天我组织项目内的所有成员以及邀请了项目外的同事一起做了一次验收测试。之所以要组织这个活动出于几个方面的考虑:

1、考虑到这个项目垮了个五一小长假,项目周期有点长,想跟大家一起再回顾一下整个业务流程。2、希望能在体验的过程中发现一些设计不合理或者体验不够好的地方,提出改进的建议。3、全员参与的情况下如果对现在已实现的业务功能有不满意的地方,后续修改起来也不太会有心理上排斥。

最后一个最重要的一点:项目是大家一起完成的,最终能在上线前先能得到大家自己的一致评价是很重要的。也让我们能感受到自己做的东西是得到内部认可的,即使有不满意的地方也能及时提出来并改正。在自认为各方面都达到要求能带给用户好的体验的前提下让项目上线,这是要经过一个自我肯定和完善的过程,也恰恰是这个过程让我们能够沉淀更好的产品带给用户更好的体验。

在落实了这个活动后,我个人的收获也不少。首先,能够在项目的过程中推动这件事情,并且组织好这个活动就是一种能力的提升。其次,作为项目的测试负责人,利用这个活动也是变相的收集到了很多用户体验方面的问题,有利于之后测试工作中对于用户体验测试方面的加强。最后,这个活动的顺利进行让项目更是锦上添花跟大家摩擦出了很多火花,能感受到大家对工作的热情有所提高,我个人在团队中的形象以及专业度也是有所提升。

      另外发生了一件事情也让我有一些思考,项目过程中有产品的需求变更,对应的开发同学也同意了变更,在沟通的过程中,有同事说因为开发太好说话了,所以对于产品中途的需求变更就答应了。在我看来这句话就是传说中的伤害性不大侮辱性极强。产品之所以变更需求是有他的考量,开发之所以答应变更是因为需求变更后更合理才同意修改。否则,就是不专业了。我没有针对同事,只是刚巧看到工作群里大家的聊天记录,引发了我的思考,语言表达上稍有不同它的意义就是不一样的。如果这句话换成,是因为变更后更合理了开发才同意这个变更。这样是正向的一种肯定。

      其实我们在工作中大可不必做老好人,做一个专业严谨人更重要。面对事情的处理我们可以有很多种方式,但是要有唯一的原则去支撑。

————————

There are some new ideas and thoughts at work this week. A project I was responsible for recently went online. Three days before the project went online, I organized all members of the project and invited colleagues outside the project to do an acceptance test together. The reason for organizing this activity is due to several considerations:

1. Considering that the project broke down for a small and long may day holiday and the project cycle is a little long, I would like to review the whole business process with you. 2. I hope to find some unreasonable design or poor experience in the process of experience and put forward suggestions for improvement. 3. In the case of full participation, if you are dissatisfied with the business functions that have been realized, subsequent modifications are not likely to be psychologically excluded.

The last and most important point: the project is completed by everyone together. It is very important to get your own unanimous evaluation before going online. It also makes us feel that what we do is internally recognized, and we can put forward and correct any dissatisfaction in time. On the premise that we believe that all aspects meet the requirements and can bring users a good experience, we need to go through a process of self affirmation and improvement. It is precisely this process that allows us to precipitate better products and bring users a better experience.

After implementing this activity, I personally gained a lot. First of all, being able to promote this thing in the process of the project and organize this activity well is a kind of ability improvement. Secondly, as the test director of the project, this activity also collects a lot of user experience problems in disguise, which is conducive to strengthening the user experience test in the later test work. Finally, the smooth progress of this activity makes the project even more icing on the cake. I have a lot of sparks with you. I can feel that your enthusiasm for work has improved, and my personal image and professionalism in the team have also improved.

In addition, something happened that made me think. During the project, there were changes in product requirements, and the corresponding development students also agreed to the changes. In the process of communication, some colleagues said that because the development was too easy to talk, they responded to the changes in product requirements in the middle of the project. In my opinion, this sentence is not very hurtful and insulting in the legend. The reason why the product needs to be changed is his consideration. The reason why the development agrees to change is that it agrees to modify after the demand is changed more reasonably. Otherwise, it is unprofessional. I didn’t aim at my colleagues. I just happened to see the chat records of everyone in the work group, which triggered my thinking. The language expression is slightly different, and its meaning is different. If this sentence is replaced by, the development agrees to the change because it is more reasonable after the change. This is a positive affirmation.

In fact, we don’t have to be good people in our work. It’s more important to be a professional and rigorous person. There are many ways to deal with things, but there should be a single principle to support it.